Question 2
Prove that is irrational.
UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION
The problem asks to show that the number cannot be expressed as a ratio of two integers. The core idea is a proof by contradiction using the known fact that is irrational. If were rational, simple algebraic manipulation would imply is rational, contradicting the established result.
STEP 1 — ASSUME THE CONTRARY
Suppose, for the sake of contradiction, that is a rational number. Then there exist integers and such that
STEP 2 — ISOLATE
Subtract from both sides and then divide by :
The right‑hand side is a ratio of two integers, hence rational.
STEP 3 — RECALL THE IRRATIONALITY OF
It is a classic result that is irrational. A standard proof assumes in lowest terms, squares both sides to obtain , and deduces that both and must be even, contradicting the assumption that the fraction is reduced.
STEP 4 — DERIVE THE CONTRADICTION
Step 2 shows would be rational, while Step 3 states is irrational. This contradiction means our original assumption is false.
STEP 5 — CONCLUDE
Therefore cannot be rational; it is irrational.
ANSWER
is irrational.
COMMON MISTAKES
Assuming that adding a rational number (like ) to an irrational automatically yields an irrational without justification; forgetting to isolate correctly; overlooking the need to prove is irrational as a separate lemma.